Reason for 3: Band selection on the K3 is via a BAND+/BAND- switch or
via the numeric pad memory channel recall if programmed. The KPA500
provides band buttons, and if it is located in front of you, simplified
band changing ... just push the button. If a non-Elecraft radio has
one-touch band selection, you are correct, #3 isn't a big advantage.
73,
Fred {"Skip"] K6DGW
Sparks NV DM09dn
Washoe County
On 7/15/2018 7:05 PM, ANDY DURBIN wrote:
I'd like to understand all the operational advantages of integrating a K3 with
a KPA500 and KAT500 that are not available to those who chose to use a TS-590
instead of a K3.
I know about:
1. KPA500 and KAT500 know TX frequency and configure band, antenna, and
tuning solution before transmitting
2. Adjustment of power output is based on band and KPA500 OP/STBY mode
3. Selection of band on KPA500 is passed to K3 and KAT500.
I have developed an Arduino based interface that implements 1. 2 seems to be
doable and useful. 3 seems doable but not very useful. What else is there?
Thanks and 73,
Andy k3wyc
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
--
This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be clean.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
