Not sure what you want to do here, but when running KPA1500 Remote in its client/server configuration you can make control changes and monitor the amp via either the client or the server instance, running on different computers, and they follow each other. I've seen no discrepancies. In my shack, the server instance is connected to the amp via USB and connects to the client instance via Ethernet across the LAN or WAN. For me, the simultaneous operation characteristic is just a curiosity - if I'm in the shack, I use either the physical control panel or the USB-connected instance of KPA1500 Remote. If I'm operating remotely, I use the client instance running on my local computer. So I only see and play with the dual access capability when I'm in the shack (the "radio site") and experimenting with the configuration.
73, /Rick N6XI -- Rick Tavan Truckee, CA On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Paul Baldock <[email protected]> wrote: > At 03:59 PM 8/6/2018, you wrote: > >> The KPA1500 Remote s/w, which should be on our website later this week, >> supports both a local operation via direct connection via USB or ethernet >> to the amp. >> > > Will I be able to control the KPA1500 using 2 different programs > simultaneously, one talking via Ethernet and one via USB, without conflict? > > - Paul KW7Y > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [email protected] > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
