I would like to see radical modularity. Having more than two
receivers would allow diversity receive while monitoring other
frequency(s). Separating the tuner from the radio would allow
locating the tuner close to the antenna. Multiple tuners might
be needed for widely separated antennas. Being able to select
from multiple antennas to select the two diversity antennas and
a possible third transmit antenna would be useful.
One module that would be very useful would be a
user-programmable command multiplexer which would allow users to
develop their own control algorithms for the radio while also
allowing several other RS-232 programs to control the radio.
I've already posted about improvements in the P3 UI.
I would love to sit around and brainstorm with others on this question.
73 Bill AE6JV
On 3/24/19 at 5:14 PM, [email protected] (Eric Swartz WA6HHQ -
Elecraft) wrote:
Inquiring minds want to know: What would you all like to see as
a “K4” ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | Re: Computer reliability, performance, and security:
408-356-8506 | The guy who *is* wearing a parachute is
*not* the
www.pwpconsult.com | first to reach the ground. - Terence Kelly
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
