Wayne was looking for 1mW output. How does that equate in regard to the regs?
David G3UNA > On 18 October 2019 at 22:58 Fred Jensen <k6...@foothill.net> wrote: > > > If they're unlicensed, they will be intentional radiators subject to > 47CFR15 Subpart C [15.201 et seq] which imposes field strength limits > that vary with frequency. 15.201(b) may also require certification. > Depending on choice of frequency, 150 mW may be way too high since in > the 1.7 - 30 MHz range, the limit is 30 uV/m at 30 m. I think Wayne has > hit on a great idea, it's just going to take some Part 15 engineering. > > 73, > Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW > Sparks NV DM09dn > Washoe County > > On 10/17/2019 4:07 PM, Jeff Kabel wrote: > > 1) Wouldn't it be better to use one of the ISM bands? Then licensing is not > > a problem. I'd feel uncomfortable giving radios that operate in the ham > > bands to people without a license. There are bands 6.765-6.795MHz, > > 13.553-13.567MHz, and 26.957-27.283 close to our 40, 20, and 12/10 meter > > bands, and a number of bands in the VHF+ range. The 13MHz one is used by > > the HiFER <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LowFER> experimenters already. > > There are also the LowFER and MedFER bands. > > > > 2) Does the pixie not meet the requirements? They're cheap ($3-5 on eBay), > > low power (~150mW), and have QSK. The kits you buy don't have a volume > > control, but that is simple to add. > > > > > > -- Jeff aa6xa > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
