I suppose I am the "Bob" you refer to.   The section in Rob's article on Odd-Order Intermodulation he clearly explains "worse".

Our receivers have gotten much better over the years but unfortunately our transmitters and amplifiers have gotten worse. To quantify, the ARRL published a compendium of distortion products of linear amplifiers in 1997.  The third order distortion was in the 40 and 50 dB PEP range.    In 2019 an ARRL review of solid state legal limit amplifiers reported the third order distortion was only down 30 dB.  This is a 10 to 20 dB degradation from 1997 to 2019.    I'd call this "worse".

73

Bob, K4TAX

On 11/3/2019 6:56 PM, Bill K9YEQ wrote:

“worse” seems a bit much when looking at the actual levels.  Bob, did you mean something else?  I know this is semantics….

73,

Bill

K9YEQ

https://wrj-tech.com/

*From:*[email protected] <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Rob Sherwood
*Sent:* Sunday, November 3, 2019 5:16 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [Elecraft-K3] K3S to be discontinued

The K3S is excellent in respect to transmit composite noise. Transmit IMD, on the other hand, is quite different at various power levels.  The sweet spot is around 35 watts, but much worse at 12 watts and 100 watts.  Here is composite noise data.  Hopefully the formatting will hold up.

Rob, NC0B

Transmit Composite Noise Rig Comparisons 20 meters values in dBc/Hz

Rig @ 100 watts                2 kHz offset        10 kHz offset      20 kHz offset      100 kHz offset

K3S -141                       n/a                         -143

FTdx-101D -133                       -137 -138                       -141

IC-7851 -129                       n/a                         -138

IC-7610 -128                       -130                       -142

Flex 6400 -122                       -127                       -139

IC-7300 -121                       -121                       -124

FTdx-3000 -120                       n/a                         -121

TS-890S                 -116 -119                       -127                       -139

Rig @ 30 watts                   2 kHz offset        10 kHz offset      20 kHz offset      100 kHz offset

FTdx-101D -129                       -134 -135                       -137

K3S -132                       n/a                         -140

IC-7851 -123                       n/a                         -133

IC-7610 -122                       -124                       -127

Flex 6400 -120                       -125 -137

FTdx-3000 -117                       n/a                         -117

TS-890S                 -112 -115                       -124                       -135

IC-7300 -110                       -109                       -116

*From:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Wes
*Sent:* Sunday, November 03, 2019 10:32 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [Elecraft-K3] K3S to be discontinued

If TX IMD is the issue, K3 and K3S transmitters are a real mixed bag.  My old K3 at 30 watts is fantastic, with IMD at all frequencies better than -40 dBc (ARRL method).  The same radio at 10W is the worst of my two radios, except at 24 MHz where the K3 and K3S tie at -22 dBc.

It's been hard to keep up with these measurements since the KLPA3A in the K3S has been replaced twice and the KPA3A is IIRC, on the fourth version.

Wes  N7WS

On 11/3/2019 8:16 AM, Martin Sole wrote:

    I suspect the quality of the transmitter particularly with regard
    to its composite noise spectrum to be a large player. Some radios
    with high end receiver performance have rudimentary (I'm being
    kind) transmitter composite noise performance.

    See what NK7Z, NC0B and K9YC have written about this.


    Martin, HS0ZED

    On 03/11/2019 21:30, Mark Morin wrote:

        My experience is that the type of rig does make a difference
        for close coexistence. We’ve found on DxPeditions that an
        upgraded K3 with KPA500 and a Kenwood TS-590s also with
        KPA500, can coexist quite well with antennas about 300 ft
        apart. On most bands, we can operate SSB and CW simultaneously
        with tolerable QRM. Other times we have tried different
        high-end rigs in similar setup and found that opposite end of
        same-band operation was nearly impossible due to QRM. I
        suspect it’s mostly the receivers that makes the difference.

        Mark VA2MM

_._,_._,_
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#31452) <https://groups.io/g/Elecraft-K3/message/31452> | Reply To Group <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Re:%20Re%3A%20%5BElecraft-K3%5D%20K3S%20to%20be%20discontinued> | Reply To Sender <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Private:%20Re:%20Re%3A%20%5BElecraft-K3%5D%20K3S%20to%20be%20discontinued> | Mute This Topic <https://groups.io/mt/37762870/535603> | New Topic <https://groups.io/g/Elecraft-K3/post>

Your Subscription <https://groups.io/g/Elecraft-K3/editsub/535603> | Contact Group Owner <mailto:[email protected]> | Unsubscribe <https://groups.io/g/Elecraft-K3/leave/1871785/912976473/xyzzy> [[email protected]]

_._,_._,_
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected] 

Reply via email to