How much money would you like to bet? As much as Eric and Wayne? If your assertion were true, no one would buy a Flex, or an Icom or a FTDX-101. Hams love new stuff and there's a reason that Wayne and Eric are willing to bet their actual money against your virtual money that lots of ops will want a K4. If you've been following this list, people have been asking for a replacement for the K3/K3S for a decade. I'm pretty sure if Elecraft builds it, the customers will come.

The K4 will likely have a cleaner signal than the K3S due to predistortion.

73,
Scott N9AA


On 11/4/19 9:42 PM, David Gilbert wrote:

I don't want to look like I'm beating a dead horse so this will be my last comment on the subject, but my point was that I don't think very many contest stations or DXpeditions are going to sell their K3s rigs to buy a K4 (I don't see a compelling reason for them to do so), so I'm not sure how much value there is in it being a 12 volt rig even if the price range is similar.   If anyone views that differently I'd like to hear their reasoning.

And I'd bet a lot of money that most contesters or DXpedition operators would be glued to their laptop screens and punching keyboard buttons instead of watching the LCD display on the rig. I know that I have operated entire major contests without ever touching anything except the tuning knob on my K3.  Everything else I need to do is controllable from N1MM+.

The capability for future features could of course prove me wrong on both accounts, but for now it just doesn't seem to me that they would likely override the immediate value in having a significantly cleaner signal.  Clearly Elecraft has made their choice, for better or for worse.

Done now.  ;)

73,
Dave   AB7E



______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected] 

Reply via email to