Well, when a minority few seem to think that they should be special
enough to use far more bandwidth than the rest of us do, then I'd say
the horse isn't dead yet. If everyone ran AM that wide that the bands
would sound horrible. If that isn't a good enough definition of
presumed entitlement I don't know what is.
Why Elecraft is willing to enable people to use 10 KHz of bandwidth for
no good communication reason is beyond me. It would certainly make me
think thrice about supporting a K4.
And Joe didn't bring up the subject ... you and W2XJ did.
Dave AB7E
On 3/2/2020 1:13 PM, Grant Youngman wrote:
smh … :-(
Why did I know this would happen? Do we really have to keep beating this same
tired horse? Really?
Grant NQ5T
On Mar 2, 2020, at 3:06 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2020-03-02 11:34 AM, Grant Youngman wrote:
A maximum around 6 KHz would be better,
Audio response greater than 3 KHz is *never* appropriate for
amateur radio. Amateur radio is, after all, a communications
service not an entertainment medium.
As a certain FCC official said in a hamfest forum a few years
ago, "if you want more than 3 KHz, get a *BROADCAST* license."
73,
... Joe, W4TV
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
