Well said, Dave 73
K0PP On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 14:23 David Gilbert <xda...@cis-broadband.com> wrote: > > Well, when a minority few seem to think that they should be special > enough to use far more bandwidth than the rest of us do, then I'd say > the horse isn't dead yet. If everyone ran AM that wide that the bands > would sound horrible. If that isn't a good enough definition of > presumed entitlement I don't know what is. > > Why Elecraft is willing to enable people to use 10 KHz of bandwidth for > no good communication reason is beyond me. It would certainly make me > think thrice about supporting a K4. > > And Joe didn't bring up the subject ... you and W2XJ did. > > Dave AB7E > > > > On 3/2/2020 1:13 PM, Grant Youngman wrote: > > smh … :-( > > > > Why did I know this would happen? Do we really have to keep beating > this same tired horse? Really? > > > > Grant NQ5T > > > >> On Mar 2, 2020, at 3:06 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV <li...@subich.com> wrote: > >> > >> On 2020-03-02 11:34 AM, Grant Youngman wrote: > >>> A maximum around 6 KHz would be better, > >> Audio response greater than 3 KHz is *never* appropriate for > >> amateur radio. Amateur radio is, after all, a communications > >> service not an entertainment medium. > >> > >> As a certain FCC official said in a hamfest forum a few years > >> ago, "if you want more than 3 KHz, get a *BROADCAST* license." > >> > >> 73, > >> > >> ... Joe, W4TV > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
