On 2020-10-16 13:31:+0000, Ken B wrote:
>Why do you use red  and not blue or green 

Good question.
Long answer that I'll keep short.
In days of old, mariners wanted lights that they could see by, but that are not 
too visible otherwise.
Enter red lights. Humans eyes are not very responsive to red light. More to 
blue, and max for green.

But now imagine that you are on a ship, and you want to see stuff, but not be 
too visible to other ships (military use). So you use red light. It's not 
discernable as much as white, green, blue...from a distance.

So we continue to use red.

Night vision is pretty sensitive. You'd be surprised at how much you can see at 
extremely low levels of light. If color rendition is not an issue, then night 
vision, using the rods, rather than cones, is not a bad idea. But if color 
rendition is important (think nav charts [I sail and fly at night]), then very 
dim white light might be more useful. Downside is that the cones, which we use 
for color, are not nearly as sensitive as rods, which are for shades of grey. 
So there are trade offs.

I don't see why green or blue could not be used at very low levels. Your eyes 
are way more sensitive to green, so you could possibly get by with much dimmer 
green or blue light than red.

There is way more...but this is a good start, and I'll wrap by saying that any 
of the colored lights will have drawbacks. Depends on what you are looking at. 
For me, red is a good choice because I can see all my radio gear clearly using 
a red light, and because it is readily available in the low power that I want. 
Green and blue (and yellow, etc) are also available, but at higher power. I 
don't want to overwhelm my rods and then await recovery. 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected] 

Reply via email to