Ed Stallman-2 wrote > The KPA1500 is new to me and very happy with my purchase . I'm using the > LP-100A watt meter and comparing it with the KPA-1500 they both read > close enough 10 to 160 . On 6m I'm seeing a bigger spread with the > LP-100A reading 1500w the KPA-1500 is showing 1375w . If you look at > this in DB , it's nothing. I know the LP-100A is very accurate and the > only way to know for sure is to have Larry at Telepost test it. Most > likely wont do wont do that. Are their others that see a difference on 6m > ? > > Thanks Ed N5DG
I have the same setup Ed (KPA1500/LPA-100A). I've always seen a difference, and never really paid much attention to it. When I read your email I ran some very quick and dirty tests, here's what I'm seeing: 80M: LPA -- 1322, KPA1500 -- 1513 40M: LPA -- 1325, KPA1500 -- 1504 6M: LPA -- 1345, KPA1500 -- 1550 Pretty consistent with your 6M readings. Are you seeing much closer numbers than mine? 73, Lou W0FK -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
