Do any of the mics you mentioned have frequency response curves similar
to high articulation mics like the original Astatic D-104? or the
vintage Heil HC-4/5 ???
_________________________________________
Howdy! Good question, Tony.
Yes, some electret capsules and maybe fewer dynamic cartridges have the
frequency response curve you seek, although it is somewhat difficult to
separate them from the larger herd. One must research each response
curve graph or learn of one from a vendor or mic expert to narrow the
field to what you seek. A lot of microphones have a response curve
and tone pattern like the famous Shure SM58, about the most popular
vocal mic in the past 40 years. One exception is the AudioTechnica
MB1000L, from the AT Midnight Blues collection, which has the thinner,
more articulate sound you mention. You just have to do you homework
to find one like that.
Some guys use particular capacitors to modify the tone of a particular
microphone, thinning or thickening the tone by rolling off high or low
frequencies. For example, in a related application, Leo Fender used to
ad a .1 uf capacitor to roll off the bright, almost harsh tone of a
Fender Telecaster electric guitar. Modern players use different
capacitor values because they feel Leo's pick makes bass tones sound
thick, dull and "muddy." The point is, you might mod a particular
microphone to achieve the frequency response curve and "tone" you
desire. Therefore, if you cannot find a particular capsule or
cartridge that suits your taste, you might modify one to complete the
task. OR - you might employ a microphone pre-amplifier and/or outboard
equalizer or mixer with EQ controls to achieve the desired result. As
another op mentioned yesterday, HEIL stopped selling multiple
cartridges, as so many modern transceivers have adjustable transmit EQ
to achieve the desired result.
Someone mentioned the $20 BM-800 electret condenser microphone which
looks like a larger, more robust large diaphragm studio microphone, but
has a much smaller, less capable condenser capsule. And yet it DOES
sound OK, PROVIDED you use it carefully and speak close to its sweet
spot (best speaking distance for best S/N etc. ) - but I find it is
comparatively noisy compared to a) higher quality, slightly more
expensive larger diaphragm condenser microphones - e.g., the Behringer
B1, and compared to 2) a performance style dynamic microphone, such
as the Sennheiser e835. Bob Heil correctly explains why he does not
favor condenser microphones - they tend to be much more sensitive and
capture more ambient noise in the shack, as they say in the business,
that type of capsule can "pick up a gnat's fart across the room" (sorry
for being crude, but that IS what THEY say!) A close-talked
performance type dynamic cartridge captures less ambient noise when
transmitting. They also tend to have more narrow response curves which,
as another op suggested, may be better suited to producing
communications audio.
So, you pays your money and you takes your chances. Do due diligence
and find the mic that suits your voice and objectives best. Good luck.
Just a few ideas. Good Luck. K8JHR
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
