In the presences of a lot of background noise (as on 160m) slower speeds can sometimes improve readability. Your ear/brain benefits from being able to integrate the tone over the noise. Some years ago I did some experiments with that here:
http://www.ab7e.com/weak_signal/mdd.html (toward the end of the page) 73, Dave Ab7E On 11/9/2022 6:56 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
I generally enjoy the ARRL 160m 'test as it is typically sub 30 WPM. 73, Nate, N0NB
______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
