Solosko, Robert B (Bob) wrote:

The ability of software such as HRD to control a K2 is what gave me
the idea for a hardware front panel extension that would interface
through a KIO2.

Both a software 'panel' such as HRD or N4PY or a hardware extension communicating via the KIO2 have one big problem: they are too sluggish to provide the kind of response that I want from the controls. This is probably in part because the interface has to wait for the microprocessor, but there are other factors that slow things down if you want to do more than just replace the buttons on the K2 with remote ones.

For example, N4PY allows you to set up each VFO with a different bandwidth; a nice feature for DX pileups, but impossibly slow for that purpose since it requires the simulation of several button presses.

Elecraft designed the computer interface for maximum compatibility with existing software (it's a superset of the Kenwood command set). The K2's microprocessor is very heavily loaded and one of the things that impresses me is that Wayne managed to get the K2 to work so smoothly despite this! However, the computer interface is not a high-performance one.
--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to