You are probably right.  It  just won't do full break in then of course.

But everything is a tradeoff, right?

73,
Dave  AB7E



On 7/29/2026 1:37 PM, Gwen Patton wrote:
I still say turning off the thing while transmitting would solve it. You don't need to process the side one.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
73,
Gwen, NG3P

On Wed, Jul 29, 2026, 15:12 David Gilbert via Elecraft <[email protected]> wrote:


    ChatGPT tells me that almost all of the latency is due to the
    frame size
    of the FFT processor.  At the application's default sample rate of
    2024
    that works out to be just barely under the 43 msec I measured.  That
    sample rate is needed to do the actual processing with decent
    results,
    so the best workaround seems to be a two path approach ... use a much
    lower frame size when the sidetone is detected and the default frame
    size when it isn't.  Theoretically the latency could be dropped to
    maybe
    less than 5 msec.

    And as you say, if everything was implemented inside the radio, the
    keying itself could control that with almost zero latency.

    73,
    Dave   AB7E



    On 7/29/2026 10:30 AM, Walter Underwood via Elecraft wrote:
    > The algorithm probably has inherent latency regardless of where
    it is implemented. This is one of the challenges of digital
    processing.
    >
    > But…if implemented internal to a radio, the sidetone could
    bypass the processing.
    >
    > wunder
    > K6WRU
    > Walter Underwood
    > CM87wj
    > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
    >
    >> On Jul 29, 2026, at 10:03 AM, Gwen Patton via Elecraft
    <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >> Can it just turn off when sending CW? When you go back to
    listening, turn
    >> it back on? It doesn't need to be on while you're manually
    sending CW, you
    >> can't hear the noise anyway because you're transmitting.
    >>
    >>
    >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    >> 73,
    >> Gwen, NG3P
    >>
    >>
    >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 2:19 AM David Gilbert via Elecraft <
    >> [email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >>> A ham that has been experimenting with my NoiseNuller application
    >>> pointed out to me where the current latency is indeed a
    problem, and
    >>> that is when listening to the sidetone while sending CW with a
    key or
    >>> paddle.  The sidetone audio coming out of the computer is
    delayed enough
    >>> to throw off your keying at anything other than pretty slow
    speeds if
    >>> you depend upon that for feedback.  It wouldn't be a problem
    for keying
    >>> from a keyboard, but it is when manually keying.
    >>>
    >>> I'm working to improve that.
    >>>
    >>> In my opinion, though, it's just another reason why this kind of
    >>> processing really belongs inside the rig itself.
    >>>
    >>> 73,
    >>> Dave   AB7E
    >>> ______________________________________________________________
    >>> Elecraft mailing list
    >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
    >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
    >>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
    >>>
    >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
    >>> Please help support this email list:
    http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
    >>> Message delivered to [email protected]
    >> ______________________________________________________________
    >> Elecraft mailing list
    >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
    >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
    >> Post: mailto:[email protected]
    >>
    >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
    >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
    >> Message delivered to [email protected]
    > ______________________________________________________________
    > Elecraft mailing list
    > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
    > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
    > Post: mailto:[email protected]
    >
    > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
    > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
    > Message delivered to [email protected]

    ______________________________________________________________
    Elecraft mailing list
    Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
    Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
    Post: mailto:[email protected]

    This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
    Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected] 

Reply via email to