George,

Thanks for bringing up this important issue. (The information below will be added to the FAQ when we get it going.)

The K3 will provide backward compatibility with some, but not all K2 auxBus peripherals. It will support the transverters and KRC2, but probably not the KAT100 or KPA100. If there's a way to make them work in the future we'll add support, but not in the first release of the transceiver, and probably not this year.

In general, K3 auxbus device control will be limited to receive-mode communications. This means we can detect and set up auxbus devices at power-up, as well as send them band-change commands.

Here's the reason for our hesitance to support transmit-mode auxbus devices, such as the KAT100 and KPA100:

Like most modern transceivers with extensive computer support, the K3 is the nexus for many low-level I/O signals (soundcard inputs and outputs, panadapter output, external reference input, etc.). The location of all these signals is the KIO3 module. This is also where our "ACC" connector is that has the auxBus line.

Since the KPA100 and KAT100 make heavy use of the auxBus during transmit, there's the potential for RFI on these low-level signals lines during transmit at high power, through inadequate shielding, ground loops, or just proximity. It would take much more shielding, multilayer PC boards, and more complex internal and external cabling to ensure that this wasn't a problem. This would greatly increase the cost of the K3.

We'll review what devices we can control as we start to do more complex system tests.

73,
Wayne
N6KR

---

http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to