-----Original Message-----
From: Brett gazdzinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Just what drives the choice of 15 KHz?

Here's my semi-educated guess. Correct me if I'm wrong, folks!:

The reason for the conversion to a low last-IF is to feed the DSP filter-decoder system. The lower you go, the better, because you get more samples per Hz of signal. (If you are sampling a 15 kHz signal 150,000 times per second, that's 10,000 samples per Hz, but if you were to sample a 150 kHz signal the same number of times per second you only get 1000 samples per Hz.) All else being equal, more samples per Hz is better, as is more bits per sample.
But increasing either means more processor power is needed.

You can't go much lower than 15 kHz without getting down into audio. Plus you also have roofing-filter issues at low IFs (if you tried to convert from the first IF to, say, 5 kHz, the oscillator is only 5 kHz from the filter passband, and the secondary image is only 10 kHz away.)

Every design is a series of tradeoffs. 15 kHz is the optimum tradeoff for all these issues given the
available parts and other design issues.

---

You are probably familiar with receivers of the 1950-60s era which used a last IF in the 50 to 250 kHz range. From the Hallicrafters SX-88/S-76 to the Drake R4B and many in between, this was done because it allowed a reasonable number of practical LC circuits to provide the selectivity. Again, a tradeoff - lower IF was better for selectivity but made the secondary-image problem
worse, while a higher IF meant more tuned circuits were needed.

The introduction of practical high frequency xtal filters ended that design.

73 de Jim, N2EY
________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to