On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 02:20:38 +0000, you wrote: >Hello all, > >has anyone made receiver side by side comparisons of a K3 and a TenTec >Orion/Orion II? >As far as I know the conversion principle of both transceivers is quite >similar. I'm not sure about the concept of roofing filters... > >As one may expect an improvement because of the newer design of the K3 >against the Orion, is this remarkable in contest situations e.g.? > >Any comment is appreciated and may be also interesting for other list >readers. > > >73 de Henning, DL1OJ >(k2 #1444, k3 #???? 2nd prod. run)
I have an Orion II to compare the K3 to. When I receive the K3 (late Jan) I will make RX comparisons. I'm hoping that the K3 does not suffer from the RX hiss the Orion II suffers when not connected to an antenna. As to changing bands; The only time I change bands rapidly is when using cluster reports. The remote control of modern rigs solves the band change issue for me, so, although having band change buttons is more convenient it's not an issue for me. In addition the Orion II Main and Sub receivers are not synched well. It is irritating to set B to the frequency of A and hear the resulting warble caused by the 6hz mismatch between the VFOs when listening to both. I've never experienced this on any other rig with two VFOs. I believe the K3 doesn't suffer from this issue. Tom, N5GE - SWOT 3537 - Grid EM12jq They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. http://www.n5ge.com http://www.eQSL.cc/Member.cfm?N5GE _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
