G4ILO wrote:
I think you're wrong about that, David. The message with the long lines that
provoked this off-topic digression was not posted through Nabble. My post
Then why does it have a nabble message-ID? Maybe there is more than
one way of posting using nabble tools and only some do not obey the
first part of the internet requirement "be correct in what you send; be
tolerant in what you accept".
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
Subject: [Elecraft] k3-broadcast band reception
Cc:
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:34:34 -0800
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
just now through Nabble appears properly wrapped when viewed through
MailMan.
Your headers don't mention JavaMail, so I suspect that is the problem
tool, at least for nabble postings.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
