Joe Subich, W4TV-3 wrote: > >> * SSB TRANSMIT BANDPASS EXTENDED AT LOW END. Improvement >> is about 2 dB at 300 Hz, 3 dB at 200 Hz, and 6 dB at 100 Hz. > > Can this be made optional? Excess LF response only wastes > power at low frequencies and occupies excess bandwidth. > >> Additional improvement possible via TX EQ. > > Will TX EQ be made mode and/or input dependent? Setting TX EQ > for voice screws up the audio response for digital mode (AFSK A > and DATA A) operation. The same is true for RX EQ. > I second this suggestion. I personally did not like the extra bass in my audio. I have compensated for this using the TX EQ. But as you say, doing that is less than ideal for data modes.
I also find, apart from the excessive FM deviation that I mentioned before, that the FM sounds a bit "thin" compared to SSB. I'm wondering if the FM audio needs a bit more de-emphasis. If it's just a matter of personal preference, then I can't use TX EQ to adjust it to my liking as long as there is only one TX EQ setting for all modes. ----- Julian, G4ILO K3 s/n: 222 K2 s/n: 392 G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/K3-FIRMWARE-UPDATE%3A---MCU-1.87%2C-DSP-1.69---%28Finally%21%29-tp17041394p17052312.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
