We're not broadcasters, we're communicators. That extra frequency response takes away from the spectrum available for our fellow Amateurs.
Don't even get me started on that "ESSB" stuff...and why is AM even LEGAL anymore, anyway? 73, Steve NN4X On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Mike Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am surprised to hear that people don't like the extra bandwidth in the > audio response in the K3. > > For me I have been reluctant to check into a regular rag chew net until I > could have some extra low frequency response. I knew that the K3 wouldn't > measure up and I didn't want the K3 to be seen in a poor light. > > Yes I am quite familiar that this is the opposite of good dx performance but > these guys don't care about dx at all. They care about comfortable > listening. I of course care about dx when I want it and rag chew when I want > it. Now I can have both. AM sounds so much fuller now also. > > > > I wouldn't want it any other way. > > > > > > Mike Scott > > AE6WA Tarzana, CA > > K3/100 SN508 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [email protected] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
