I'm getting the same result as Bob. No matter how I set the threshold, 2,3, Automatic, etc, I cannot get it to perform as well as the old 1.78 version which was just amazing.
Windy KM5Q Well, I have, and found that the lower the threshold, the less stable. Using the beta version, with THR = 2 excursions of 20 Hz between auto-spot invocations are not uncommon - yet on the same signal (S5 or so) the 1.78 version performs very well. The side by side comparison with two rigs using the same signal is telling. I'll play with it a bit more this evening. Bob NW8L On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bob, > > Try setting the threshold to 2 or 3 (CWT Hold). With a fixed > threshold, it seems very close to the previous performance on > all but the strongest signals (and even the old FW was a bit > touchy with S9+20 signals). > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/K3-BETA-FIRMWARE-RELEASE----MCU-rev-1.94-tp17199166p17215426.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
