At 06:33 PM 7/26/2008, Mike Short wrote...
Will RG-174 handle 100W at HF/6M?
Maybe. RG-188A/U (Belden 83269) might be a bit better, it's rated for
much higher temperatures (to 200C), and has slightly less loss (vs.
Belden 8216 RG-174/U).
http://www.belden.com/pdfs/03Belden_Master_Catalog/06Coaxial_Cables/06Coaxial_Cables.pdf
There's this: http://www.therfc.com/powerrat.htm#RG174 Says 174 is good
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 188 to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then this: www.qsl.net/va3iul/coaxloss.pdf Says 174 is good to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and 188 to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The two sources roughly agree. I assume that they assume a 1:1 SWR.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
