Joe, Your comment strikes me as unnecessarily negative. (Pollute? Crosstalk?) I thought Fred's suggestion, coming as it does from a very experienced CW contester, makes a lot of sense.
73, Jim W8ZR > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:elecraft- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV > Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 10:09 AM > To: 'cloud runner'; 'Elecraft Reflector' > Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3: listening to both rcvrs > > > If you must pollute the audio from one receiver with audio > from the other receiver, add a 5 to 10K pot between the tip > and the ring of your headphones and adjust it for the level > of pollution you need. > > There is no need for Wayne (or probably Lyle) to design > crosstalk into the DSP process. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cloud runner > > Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 11:03 AM > > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > Subject: [Elecraft] K3: listening to both rcvrs > > > > > > for what it may be worth... > > > > For my pair-of-K2's in SO2R, I have routed the audio in such > > a way that I have a balance control with the audio from the > > two radios. I call it a mixing control. I find that > > "optimum" is achieved when the full strength audio is in one > > ear, and that same audio is present, but weak in the other > > ear. I reason that when the audio goes to one ear only, the > > content must get to the other hemisphere of the brain within > > brain circuitry. When it is routed to both ears, now both > > hemispheres get the information for interpretation at the > > same time. Making it strong in one ear and weak in the > > other, reversed for the other channel, lets me know which > > rcvr I am hearing, while brain interpretation is at full speed. > > > > and so, Wayne... > > > > I think that there must be a firmware way either by routing > > to a panel pot, or probably more simply in a menu, by which > > the operator can select either complete channel isolation, or > > both channels to both ears, but with one ear X DB down from > > the other. (I can't say how much down is best,but I find > > that it is enough when I can barely notice it. All of a > > sudden copy is MUCH easier). Give it a thought because of > > the above, I, at least, am quite convinced after a lot of > > usage with a pair of K2's in SO2R, that is a much better > > arrangement for copying CW from the two channels. > > > > with much appreciation for this fine radio, > > > > 73, Fd - KT5X > > > > K2 # 0700 > > K3 # 0144 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
