I think a previous firmware version had a better NR on Phone than the version now. I don't remember which one but some made a comment concerning this. I agree also it used to seem better. Randy K8RDD
WA6L wrote: > > > You may be on to something there, Lee. I didn't even try SSB after making > those adjustments. > > Still and all, there is work to be done on the K3 NR system, or perhaps it > is the AGC algorithms. I still find the K2 noise reduction much more > effective and certainly easier to use than the K3's. > > Thanks and 73, > > John, WA6L > > > Lee Trout wrote: >> >> John: Thanks for the suggestions. I tweaked some of the AGC settings >> and >> found it did somewhat improve the N/R for CW, but to my ear, made the >> distortion on SSB worse. >> >> Perhaps the "one size fits all" is the problem? In other words, if we >> had >> PER MODE noise reduction (tailored to the mode) coupled with PER MODE rx >> eq >> I think it would improve the K3 significantly. >> >> I'm not a software engineer so don't know if it is possible to do this. >> >> 73 all, Lee (K9CM) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Post to: [email protected] >> You must be a subscriber to post to the list. >> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): >> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm >> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com >> > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Musings-on-Noise-Reduction-tp1628822p1629162.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
