And something I quite like, since so many ops seem to aim for the .00 freq anyway. 73 de M0XDF, K3 #174 -- I don't mind that you think slowly but I do mind that you are publishing faster than you think. -Wolfgang Pauli, physicist, Nobel laureate (1900-1958)
On 21 Sep 2009, at 21:52, Wayne Burdick wrote: > Sorry -- geekSpeak :) > > Suppose the VFO were tuned to, say, 7040.23, in CW mode. Further > assume your CONFIG:VFO CRS menu parameter is set to 1.0 kHz (i.e., > your COARSE tuning step is set to 1.0 kHz in CW mode). If you then go > into COARSE mode and move the VFO up one tic, you'll get 7041.23 with > present firmware. In the future you'll get 7042.00: "quantized" to the > nearest "quantum" which in this case is the next even multiple of 1.0 > kHz. > > The same will apply if you have the RIT/XIT offset control enabled for > use as VFO coarse tuning when it's not being used for RIT/XIT (see > CONFIG:VFO OFS). The control will be quantized just like the VFO when > it is in COARSE mode. > > The VFO already quantizes with smaller tuning increments selected > (e.g. 50 Hz). So quantizing COARSE increments would be more consistent > with present behavior. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
