I've done all that as well (or at least most of it), but it takes a moderate amount of time for me to check and edit the recorded audio files to make sure they sound as close to my normally transmitted voice as possible (same volume, etc). I've heard some truly horrible examples during contests where the voice file and the real-time voice sounded so different that you'd swear it was a different person. I even had one contact with a station where the recorded voice was from a man and the operator was a YL! Any confusion that sort of thing causes just slows the QSO rate.
I don't own a KDVR (yet), but one of its potential advantages would seem to be the ability to quickly set up voice memories for a new contest that sounded exactly like your normal mic voice without any additional editing. 73, Dave AB7E Lu Romero wrote: > Gents: > > Im trying to understand the need to even *consider* a KDVR > module. > > I use N1MMLogger, and have for over 4 years now. I can > record, not only messages, but numbers and letters and > phrases into the computer (pre-air processor, using my air > mic) and off air audio, up to the limiting amount of storage > that my computer's hard drive has (zillions and zillions of > messages, hours and hours of QSO's!). > > The Logger software can parse the letters and numbers. It > sends, not only pre-canned signal reports, but dynamic > callsigns and serial numbers live. If I choose to, I dont > even have to talk at all in a SSB contest (ever work Jamie, > NS3T? You worked a DVK!). > > Not only this, but with the "Enter Sends Message" feature of > Logger, I input the callsign and hit the enter key, and the > software sequences the correct function key for the QSO step > automatically. It even logs the Q when done and sends QRZ > for the next one. > > In multioperator situations, I can have all the operators > using the station record the messages and when they take > their shift, they press CTRL-O, put in their callsigns, and > the software will load the Logger's DVK with their own > personal voice message files automatically. > > Although I use a MicroKeyer 2, K3 makes interfacing to the > computer as simple as plugging in the soundcard line out > into line in on the back of the radio and plugging the > soundcard in (not really needed, but useful if I set Logger > to record each QSO) into the line out of the K3. So, worst > case, you need a USB to serial adaptor for CAT and two 1/8 > inch stereo cables for audio I/O. > > If I ever want to go portable or operate at another station > with my K3, I take my MicorKeyer 2 and the K3 interface > cable with me. Then, one single USB cable is all that is > needed to interface the computer to the MicroKeyer 2 for > full DVK, CAT and all other feature functionality in SSB, > CW, RTTY and PSK, along with any other soundcard based mode > I desire to use (The MicroKeyer 2 has its own built in sound > card). > > By the way, N1MM Logger is Freeware. > > I own lots of options for my K3, but KDVR is not one of > them. Is there any compelling reason to even *own* this > accessory, other than having a computer-less environment > which, in today's contesting environment, is not going to be > very competitive (unless your QTH is P5, Mt. Athos or > something exotic)? > > Lu Romero - W4LT > K3 S# 3192 > > > > > Message: 8 > Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:22:23 -0700 > From: "Andrew Faber" <andrewfa...@ymail.com> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - KDVR > To: "Brett Howard" <br...@livecomputers.com>, "Barry > Pfeil" > <barrypf...@sbcglobal.net> > Cc: Elecraft Reflector <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>, Fred > Jensen > <k6...@foothill.net> > Message-ID: <002701ca4d03$a893f570$f2000...@bc.local> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; > charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Brett, > As I see it the advantage is that you can send messages > from the keyboard > (particularly useful if you have an SO2R setup with the > radios spread > apart). Furthermore, you can integrate the message sending > into the normal > message sending functionality, like message repeating and > hitting ESC to > stop it. I do that with my logging program, CQPWIN, and > find it's more > convenient than continually using the radio buttons. I do > have to have the > program calibrate the length of each message first, to be > able to do the > repeating properly. It works fine. > 73, andy, ae6y > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brett Howard" <br...@livecomputers.com> > To: "Barry Pfeil" <barrypf...@sbcglobal.net> > Cc: "Elecraft Reflector" <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>; "Fred > Jensen" > <k6...@foothill.net> > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:30 AM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - KDVR > > > What makes this easier than just using the radio? Seems to > me that > its just as easy to press M1 as F1... Also now that VOX can > now stop > tx of a DVR message stopping it is as simple as pressing > nearly any > button or beginning a transmission. Heck ESC would probably > also work > if you initiated w/ M1 if it works when you press F1. > > BTH > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
