If we make any change at all to split operation, it will be optional. The present behavior will be the default.
Wayne ---- http://www.elecraft.com On Oct 18, 2009, at 1:50 PM, "Andy Faber" <[email protected]> wrote: > Can I plead for flexibility? Everyone seems to want the most > efficient > split operation for their particular way of using split, but there > are other > requirements as well. > For example, assume a DX station is using a K3 on 40m phone, say at > 7055 > kHz, and trying to listen both on its own frequency and on a split > frequency > high in the band, say at 7250 kHz. In that application, he would > want to be > able to transmit on either VFO simply by turning SPLIT on or off. He > wouldn't want any automatic frequency equalization. > I like the way SPLIT works right now, as it allows such flexibility. > 73, andy, ae6y > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
