Its pointless discussing hardware design changes for  the K3, the K3's design 
is carved in rock. It would probably be a good design  consideration for the 
K4, or K5. We are unlikely to  see different models of Elecraft products roll 
out like the Japanese roll out new radio models. I just noticed that Yaesu has 
a new radio called the  FT5000, it looks like a FT2000 and it probably has the 
same crap receiver. Its ergonomics look good though.

John






--- On Sat, 11/21/09, Ross Primrose <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Ross Primrose <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KUSB Adaptor
> To: 
> Cc: [email protected]
> Date: Saturday, November 21, 2009, 1:07 PM
> David Fleming wrote:
> > But, like Julian said, is there any advantage to using
> a plain USB cable instead a USB cable with a bulge on the
> end? :-)
> >
> >   
> There could be, if Elecraft supported it. USB 2.0 has
> enough bandwidth 
> to support a software band scope...
> 
> 73, Ross N4RP
> 
> -- 
> FCC Section 97.313(a) “At all times, an amateur station
> must use the minimum transmitter power necessary to carry
> out the desired communications.”
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 


      
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to