Vic,I am using the 1K roofer as well as the 1.8, 2.8, 6.0 and of course for CW as well the 500Hz. I use my 1Khz mainly for safe ragchewing on CW and also for brick selectivity on SSB but when your use it on voice,you must move the SHIFT to 050 to recover the inteligibility,its very effective reducing qrm from stations at less than 2Khz apart. AD4C
"For a refined ham it is compulsory to own a k3" --- On Sun, 2/14/10, Vic K2VCO <v...@rakefet.com> wrote: From: Vic K2VCO <v...@rakefet.com> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 1 kHz Filter for K3 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Date: Sunday, February 14, 2010, 7:56 PM On 2/14/2010 11:26 AM, Michael M. Raskin wrote: > Is anyone using the 1 kHz filter in the K3 subreceiver for CW? Any pros or > cons? I have one in the main rx. I got it on the grounds that I would use it in contests when running, setting the bandwidth to about 800 Hz. to catch off-frequency callers. In fact I find that 400 Hz works best, because there are usually loud stations close by! It's nice to have, but not as essential as I'd thought. -- Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
