At 11:37 PM +0100 6/9/04, James Gilmour wrote:
Dave Ketchum wrote:
To anyone else reading, my claim is:
With the Condorcet method(s), the voter ranks all
candidates liked better than "last" (optionally including ranking "last").
Is it necessary for a voter to rank ALL candidates?
No.
Does it cease to be "a Condorcet method" if
voters have the option to truncate at their respective points of indifference?
No.
--
== Eric Gorr ========= http://www.ericgorr.net ========= ICQ:9293199 ===
"Therefore the considerations of the intelligent always include both
benefit and harm." - Sun Tzu
== Insults, like violence, are the last refuge of the incompetent... ===
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
