> >Dave Ketchum wrote: > >> To anyone else reading, my claim is: > >> With the Condorcet method(s), the voter ranks all candidates > >> liked better than "last" (optionally including ranking "last").
I asked: > >Is it necessary for a voter to rank ALL candidates? Eric replied: > No. I asked: > >Does it cease to be "a Condorcet method" if > >voters have the option to truncate at their respective points of indifference? Eric replied: > No. Does Dave Ketchum agree? He made the claim. James Gilmour PS I should appreciate receiving only one copy of EM e-mails, via the EM list. ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
