Eric,
--- Eric Gorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Else (when B is D, or B and D tie pairwise) rank A>B ahead of C>D if A
> > defeats C pairwise, and C>D ahead of A>B if C defeats A pairwise."
>
> Looks interesting.
>
> What would you do if neither A nor C defeat the other pairwise?
Maybe throw a division-by-zero.
Steve Eppley seemed to think that it would be alright in a public election
to take the defeats randomly.
Hmm, couldn't you use the Schulze ranking to break these ties?
Kevin Venzke
__________________________________________________________________
D�couvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails !
Cr�ez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
