Chris Benham wrote:
Critics of IRV haven't said that IRV is evil. We've only said that IRV
isn't a significant reform or a significant improvement over Plurality.
The part after "We've only said that.." logically implies that either:
(1) "IRV is evil" , or
(2) "Plurality isn't evil, or is only slightly evil".
>
Let's just say that I was paraphrasing the clearly implied message.
One can certainly say that, but it will never make the statement truthful.
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
