Mike wrote (in part): >So, overall, the beatpath approach will sound arbitrary. The >Schwartz set approach sounds completely obvious & compelling. > >Have you defined BeatpathWinner to someone with no prior exposure to >voting systems? Try it, and tell me how clear its motivation is to >them. I don't think any explaination of either approach would be intuitively obvious to someone without prior exposure to voting systems, but I do think that SSD is much closer (or at least sounds much closer) to an intuitively fair approach.
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Markus Schulze
- RE: [EM] Cloneproof SSD LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Blake Cretney
