Mike wrote (in part):

>So, overall, the beatpath approach will sound arbitrary. The
>Schwartz set approach sounds completely obvious & compelling.
>
>Have you defined BeatpathWinner to someone with no prior exposure to
>voting systems? Try it, and tell me how clear its motivation is to
>them.

I don't think any explaination of either approach would be intuitively
obvious to someone without prior exposure to voting systems, but I do think
that SSD is much closer (or at least sounds much closer) to an intuitively
fair approach.

Reply via email to