Dear Mike, you wrote (21 Jan 2001): > When we randomly choose a tiebreaking > ballot, the members of the C clone set, no matter how many of them > there are, are no more likely to be at the top of that ballot than > A & B are. A, B, and the C clone set are equally likely to be at the > top of that tiebreaking ballot, as they should be. Adding those C > clones hasn't increased the probability of the winner being a C clone. It isn't clear to me how you use random ballot to decide which pairwise defeat you drop. Example: Suppose that you have to decide whether W:X or Y:Z is dropped. Suppose that the randomly chosen ballot is W > Y > X > Z. How does this randomly chosen ballot helps you to decide which pairwise defeat should be dropped? Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Blake Cretney
- RE: [EM] Cloneproof SSD LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Markus Schulze
- RE: [EM] Cloneproof SSD LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Cloneproof SSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
