[EM] Small erratum...

[David Catchpole]

On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, David Catchpole wrote:
> "possible configuration of votes" means a likely schema of votes. Where
> the **** does "simplex" always come from? How can a simplex on the
> triangle be interpreted as a "possible configuration of votes?"

Should have written "possible schema of votes." Slipped my mind for a
second that I was referring to possible existence, not likely existence.