Messages by Date
-
1999/12/14
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
DEMOREP1
-
1999/12/14
[EM] Introduction to "Distribution of power under stochastic social choice rules" Pattanaik and Peleg, Econometrica Vol 54 No 4 Resent-Message-Id: <"GfNao3.0.J03.N_mLu"@mx1>
David Catchpole
-
1999/12/14
Re: FPTP ...) In STV 2nd preference won't harm 1st choice
David Catchpole
-
1999/12/14
Re: [EM] Multiwinner participation rule. Reply to M. Schulze
David Catchpole
-
1999/12/14
Re: FPTP ...) In STV 2nd preference won't harm 1st choice
Bart Ingles
-
1999/12/14
Re: FPTP ...) In STV 2nd preference won't harm 1st choice
Craig Carey
-
1999/12/14
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Craig Carey
-
1999/12/14
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Bart Ingles
-
1999/12/14
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Markus Schulze
-
1999/12/14
[EM] Some more comments on PR, STV, and MMP for EM
Donald E Davison
-
1999/12/14
[EM] STV and MMP are not Too Complicated.
Donald E Davison
-
1999/12/13
Re: [EM] Multiwinner participation rule. Reply to M. Schulze
Craig Carey
-
1999/12/13
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Markus Schulze
-
1999/12/13
Re: [EM] Probability theory has nothing to do with preferential voting
David Catchpole
-
1999/12/13
[EM] Probability theory has nothing to do with preferential voting
Craig Carey
-
1999/12/12
[EM] Small erratum...
David Catchpole
-
1999/12/12
Re: [EM] Multiwinner participation rule. Geometric descriptions
David Catchpole
-
1999/12/12
[EM] Lib Dems warn Blair to look at how Britain votes
DEMOREP1
-
1999/12/12
Re: [EM] RE: The family of "regular" probabilistic (stochastic) electoralsystems
Bart Ingles
-
1999/12/12
Re: [EM] Multiwinner participation rule. Geometric descriptions
Craig Carey
-
1999/12/12
[EM] RE: The family of "regular" probabilistic (stochastic) electoral systems
DEMOREP1
-
1999/12/11
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
David Catchpole
-
1999/12/11
RE: The family of "regular" probabilistic (stochastic) electoralsystems
David Catchpole
-
1999/12/11
RE: The family of "regular" probabilistic (stochastic) electoralsystems
David Catchpole
-
1999/12/11
RE: The family of "regular" probabilistic (stochastic) electoral systems
David Catchpole
-
1999/12/11
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
David Catchpole
-
1999/12/11
[EM] (II) Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
David Catchpole
-
1999/12/11
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Markus Schulze
-
1999/12/10
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
David Catchpole
-
1999/12/10
[EM] Multiwinner participation rule. Geometric descriptions
Craig Carey
-
1999/12/10
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Markus Schulze
-
1999/12/10
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Craig Carey
-
1999/12/10
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Markus Schulze
-
1999/12/09
[EM] Final count puts NZ coalition govt as minority
DEMOREP1
-
1999/12/08
RE: The family of "regular" probabilistic (stochastic) electoralsystems
Craig Carey
-
1999/12/08
RE: The family of "regular" probabilistic (stochastic) electoralsystems
Craig Carey
-
1999/12/08
RE: The family of "regular" probabilistic (stochastic) electoral systems
DEMOREP1
-
1999/12/08
Re: [EM] It is folly to make false claims for any reform.
Blake Cretney
-
1999/12/08
Re: FPTP... Borda
Craig Carey
-
1999/12/08
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Markus Schulze
-
1999/12/07
Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing
Craig Carey
-
1999/12/07
[EM] The family of "regular" probabilistic (stochastic) electoral systems
David Catchpole
-
1999/12/03
[EM] Arizona To Pioneer Internet Voting
DEMOREP1
-
1999/12/03
[EM] New Zealand District Winners
DEMOREP1
-
1999/12/03
Re: [EM] message rejected
Steve Eppley
-
1999/12/02
[EM] It is folly to make false claims for any reform.
Donald E Davison
-
1999/12/01
[EM] Recall of a lawmaker member.
Donald E Davison
-
1999/12/01
[EM] message rejected
Donald E Davison
-
1999/12/01
[EM] To Craig Carey: The Freedom Party's Vice President
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/30
[EM] Re: The MMPP MMP method
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/30
[EM] An Improvement in Representative Democracy
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/29
Re: [EM] Accountability under.. ] The MMPP MMP method
David Catchpole
-
1999/11/29
Re: [EM] Accountability under.. ] The MMPP MMP method
Craig Carey
-
1999/11/29
[EM] Accountability under MMP: The New Zealand experience (FWD)
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/29
[EM] Cambridge, Mass 1999 City Council PR Results
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/28
[EM] New Zealand Results
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/28
[EM] Country election systems
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/28
[EM] Proportional Representation and Accountability
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/24
[EM] Riding along on a GIF file, honey...
David Catchpole
-
1999/11/24
Re: [EM] Droop as a Religious Belief
David Catchpole
-
1999/11/24
Re: [EM] Droop as a Religious Belief
Craig Carey
-
1999/11/24
Re: [EM] NZ's Labour ahead, etc. (FWD)
David Catchpole
-
1999/11/24
Re: [EM] Droop as a Religious Belief
David Catchpole
-
1999/11/23
RE: Gerrymandering Hare
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/23
[EM] FWD - Update from the Center for Voting and Democracy
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/23
[EM] Gerrymandering Hare was: More religious chanting by David
Blake Cretney
-
1999/11/23
[EM] Two Suggested Systems of STV/Open Party List
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/22
Re: [EM] "No splitting rule"
David Catchpole
-
1999/11/22
[EM] Internet Voting at UC Davis (FWD)
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/22
[EM] Washington State-- County Internet Voting Test (FWD)
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/22
[EM] NZ's Labour ahead, etc. (FWD)
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/21
Re: [EM] Two New STV Features - New to Me; Exhausted votes
Craig Carey
-
1999/11/20
[EM] More religious chanting by David
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/20
[EM] Droop Equation Corrected
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/19
0 Condorcet winners was: [EM] "No splitting rule"
Blake Cretney
-
1999/11/19
[EM] Hare-STV not proven better than Droop-STV
Craig Carey
-
1999/11/19
[EM] Droop as a Religious Belief
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/18
Re: [EM] "No splitting rule"
Craig Carey
-
1999/11/18
[EM] Political Parties and Proportional Representation
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/17
RE: A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/17
Re: [EM] RE: A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members
David Catchpole
-
1999/11/17
[EM] "No splitting rule"
David Catchpole
-
1999/11/17
Re: [EM] A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members
David Catchpole
-
1999/11/16
[EM] Droop's role in electing `Most Preferred Candidates'
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/16
[EM] RE: A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/16
[EM] STV should be a better method.
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/15
[EM] RE: A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/15
[EM] FWD - [ER] The Elecctions Reform List has moved
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/15
Re: [EM] A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/14
Re: [EM] A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members
David Catchpole
-
1999/11/14
[EM] RE: A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/14
RE: A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/14
Re: [EM] A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members
Bart Ingles
-
1999/11/14
[EM] A 48% Group elects 60% of the Droop Members
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/11
Re: [EM] Australia Votes To Keep Queen
David Catchpole
-
1999/11/11
Re: [EM] 10/30/99 - Comments on Schulze's example.
David Catchpole
-
1999/11/10
[EM] Internet Voting To Be Tested in 2000 Election
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/08
[EM] California Internet Voting Initiative (CIVI) petition
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/07
[EM] A Valid Reason to have a Lower Quota
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/06
[EM] Australia Votes To Keep Queen
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/06
[EM] Gerrymander Wars 1999
DEMOREP1
-
1999/11/06
[EM] Let's move Congress back home to where they belong.
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/06
[EM] FWD - different election methods
Donald E Davison
-
1999/11/04
Re: [EM] Christopher Hitchens, "Our Rigged Elections"
Bart Ingles
-
1999/11/04
[EM] Christopher Hitchens, "Our Rigged Elections"
Tom Round
-
1999/11/03
Re: [EM] 10/30/99 - Comments on Schulze's example.
Markus Schulze
-
1999/11/02
[EM] Iowa to put Internet voting to the test (FWD)
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/30
[EM] 10/30/99 - Comments on Schulze's example.
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/29
[EM] How to Draw Gerrymander Plans
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/29
[EM] Population per seat chart
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/29
[EM] ONTARIO 1999 MINORITY RULE SUMMARY DATA
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/28
Re: [EM] Maybe a new thread is in order ...
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/28
[EM] Ontario June 3, 1999 Summary Gerrymander Election Results
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/28
[EM] NZ voters urged to back majority, one-party rule
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/28
Re: [EM] Maybe a new thread is in order ...
Craig Carey
-
1999/10/28
[EM] The Last Temptation of David Catchpole- rated R
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/28
Re: [EM] 10/27 - David Catchpole and his STV/MMP hybrid
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/28
[EM] 10/28 - The Redemption of David Catchpole
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/28
[EM] 10/27 - David Catchpole and his STV/MMP hybrid
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/28
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
Markus Schulze
-
1999/10/27
[EM] Maybe a new thread is in order: Cross-Tasman Catfight
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/27
[EM] Senators Want Nomination Changes
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/27
[EM] Winning the Reform Party's Nomination Is Not Simple
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/27
Re: [EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole
Craig Carey
-
1999/10/27
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
Craig Carey
-
1999/10/27
[EM] Re: STV is suppose to be a PR method.
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/26
Re: [EM] David Catchpole's Droop Quota [???]
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/26
[EM] David Catchpole's Droop Quota [???]
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/26
Re: Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/26
Re: [EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/26
Re: Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/26
[EM] Re: STV is suppose to be a PR method.
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/26
Re: Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.
Craig Carey
-
1999/10/26
Re: [EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole
Blake Cretney
-
1999/10/26
Re: [EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole
Bart Ingles
-
1999/10/26
[EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/26
Re: [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method.
Markus Schulze
-
1999/10/25
[EM] Re: Proportional means equal portions of the whole.
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/25
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
Bart Ingles
-
1999/10/25
Re: [EM] Proportional means equal portions of the whole.
Bart Ingles
-
1999/10/25
Re: Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.
Craig Carey
-
1999/10/25
Re: [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method.
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/25
Re: [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method.
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/25
Re: [EM] David Catchpole and his STV/MMP hybrid
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/24
Re: [EM] Re: Proportional means equal portions of the whole.
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/24
Re: Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/24
Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/24
Re: [EM] Proportional means equal portions of the whole.
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/24
Re: [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method.
Craig Carey
-
1999/10/24
Re: [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method.
Tom Round
-
1999/10/24
[EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method.
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/23
[EM] Voting Demorep's proxies both yes and no, in proportion to district.
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/23
[EM] David Catchpole and his STV/MMP hybrid
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/23
Re: [EM] What is a wasted vote in a STV election??
pct0039
-
1999/10/23
RE: What is a wasted vote in a STV election??
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/23
[EM] What is a wasted vote in a STV election??
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/22
[EM] Re: Proportional means equal portions of the whole.
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/22
Re: Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.
Craig Carey
-
1999/10/22
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
Craig Carey
-
1999/10/22
Re: [EM] Proportional means equal portions of the whole.
Tom Round
-
1999/10/22
[EM] Proportional means equal portions of the whole.
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/21
[EM] Drawing P.R. Districts
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/21
Re: [EM] An Election is not over until It's Over
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/21
[EM] An Election is not over until It's Over
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/20
RE: Hare, Droop and MEP
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/20
Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/20
Clarification Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/20
[EM] Apology for obsolete message re: The "problem" with circularity
Hugh R. Tobin
-
1999/10/19
Re: The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney)
Hugh R. Tobin
-
1999/10/19
Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/19
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
Bart Ingles
-
1999/10/19
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
Craig Carey
-
1999/10/19
[EM] SNTV and Bottoms Up and Lowering the Numbers
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/19
[EM] Tom said: "It's cheating to deem the votes..."
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/19
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
Markus Schulze
-
1999/10/19
[EM] Update on Mike Ossipoff
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/19
[EM] Bart questions Ideal Condition of no exhausted ballots
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/18
[EM] Proxy Voting
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/18
[EM] Re: Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/18
Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/18
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
Craig Carey
-
1999/10/18
Re: [EM] Robert Winters quotation on Droop
Markus Schulze
-
1999/10/18
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
Markus Schulze
-
1999/10/18
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
Markus Schulze
-
1999/10/18
[EM] Parliamentary points of order
Tom Round
-
1999/10/17
Re: [EM] `Lowering the Numbers' is a major flaw of STV
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/17
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/17
Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/17
Re: [EM] Robert Winters quotation on Droop
David Catchpole
-
1999/10/17
[EM] Hare, Droop and MEP
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/17
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule????? [2]
Bart Ingles
-
1999/10/17
[EM] `Lowering the Numbers' is a major flaw of STV
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/17
[EM] Tom Round's `yesterday' post is lost
Tom Round
-
1999/10/17
[EM] Tom Round's `yesterday' post is lost
Donald E Davison
-
1999/10/16
[EM] TV Voting
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/16
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
Craig Carey
-
1999/10/15
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule????? [2]
Bart Ingles
-
1999/10/15
[EM] Re: Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
DEMOREP1
-
1999/10/15
[EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule????? [2]
Tom Round
-
1999/10/15
Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule
Tom Round
[Earlier messages] [Later messages]