I don't quite get you. Are you asking about alternatives to exclusion?
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, LAYTON Craig wrote:
> Yep, but I was considering the basis for excluding candidates in the first
> place. If, for a moment, you accept the system of electing by quotas and
> distributing surplus votes at fractional values (an assumption I might be
> less inclined to make after I've looked more closely at Craig Carey's
> arguments), the basis for eliminating candidates when you get to a round of
> voting in which there is no candidate with a quota is still something that
> doesn't seem very clear. In fact, once the eliminated candidates'
> preferences start affecting the count, the result seems to become
> increasingly arbitrary.
>
> >Hi Layton,
> >
> >where Nc is the number of candidates remaining that have not been elected
> >or excluded, one can conduct a "sub" STV election of Nc-1 candidates. The
> >candidate left over can be excluded.
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I only said we'd make it across"
-"Road Trip"
