Messages by Thread
-
-
[EM] FW: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
LAYTON Craig
-
[EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
Re: [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
Re: [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Papers are voters: asserting aspects of voters
Craig Carey
-
Re: [EM]
JanetRAnderson
-
Re: [EM]
David Catchpole
-
Re: [EM] Janets questions
JanetRAnderson
-
Re: [EM] Janets questions
Craig Carey
-
[EM] Craig's question
Bart Ingles
-
Re: [EM]
Bart Ingles
-
[EM] ICCPR Article 25(b) violations of Washington Citizens for Proportional Representation
Craig Carey
-
Re: [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
RE: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV
LAYTON Craig
-
[EM] Internet voting meeting (FWD)
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] The 6 paper 4W1CD problem solved.
Craig Carey
-
Re: [EM] Quick elimination of useless rules: my Meta-rules
DEMOREP1
-
Re: CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] FPP vs IRV: Monotonicity. Funny example.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
Re: [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
Markus Schulze
-
[EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website
Craig Carey
-
[EM] Markus: Tideman(m) & Condorcet Criterion
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Comments on a bizarre request.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Re: Minimizing need for insincerity
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Justification of my example definition
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
Re: Minimizing need for insincerity
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] 3 questions for Markus
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] unspecified conditions are optional
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] A simple goodbye to Markus' objection.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Reply to Demorep. Ambiguity issues.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Re: Problems with finding the probable best governor
Blake Cretney
-
[EM] Markus' error: What "B" means.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
RE: Example's dual has 2 of 3 candidates over -1/3 quota
DEMOREP1
-
Re: Request for sincerity formulae and 2 sincerity numbers; SDSC
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] How Academics Have it Backwards
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Minimizing need for insincerity
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Markus's suggested SDSC changes.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Now don't get mad, Catchy.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Reply to Markus, Craig, & Bruce
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
Re: [EM] Mr. Schulze, please prove you applied some seven M.O. rules
Markus Schulze
-
[EM] Trying again: Seeing as though I have access to a citation index...
David Catchpole
-
[EM] Re: SARC definition improvement
DEMOREP1
-
Re: Fwd: [EM] Catchy goes Taxi Driver (watch my slow descent into frustration and brutality, prompted by the madness of another!) In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
David Catchpole
-
[EM] Preoccupied with coughing up blood, 'The ring and the book' (fwd)
David Catchpole
-
Re: Fwd: [EM] Catchy goes Taxi Driver (watch my slow descent into frustration and brutality, prompted by the madness of another!) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 18:55:59 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Comments on Nanson & Condorcet Criterion.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Theorem equating Nanson AV-Borda with Condorcet: 3 candidates case shown
Craig Carey
-
[EM] Re: Sets of vertices leads nowhere; Mike Ossipoff
Joe Malkevitch
-
Re: Fwd: [EM] Catchy goes Taxi Driver (watch my slow descent into frustration and brutality, prompted by the madness of another!) In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
David Catchpole
-
Re: Sets of vertices leads nowhere; Mike Ossipoff
David Catchpole
-
[EM] Steve has used those criteria.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Definition of voting A over B, or equal to B
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
Re: Fwd: [EM] Catchy goes Taxi Driver (watch my slow descent into frustration and brutality, prompted by the madness of another!) In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Rob Lanphier
-
Re: Fwd: [EM] Catchy goes Taxi Driver (watch my slow descent into frustration and brutality, prompted by the madness of another!) In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
David Catchpole
-
Fwd: [EM] Catchy goes Taxi Driver (watch my slow descent into frustration and brutality, prompted by the madness of another!) Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 07:12:58 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Catchy goes Taxi Driver (watch my slow descent into frustration and brutality, prompted by the madness of another!) Resent-Message-Id: <"dDt0r2.0.x22.26ujv"@mx1>
David Catchpole
-
[EM] typo ("or ratings"). Point Ratings strategy insincere.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] briefer definitions. Condorcet Criterion.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Long-used strategy definitions
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Strategy definitions & sincere CW (was SARC definition improvement)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
Re: SARC definition improvement
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Strategy in IRV/elimination
Blake Cretney
-
[EM] Stronger UUCC (UUCC2)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Condorcet elevator pitch (fwd)
Rob Lanphier
-
[EM] Blake--Your 2 examples. IRV yes, Tideman no.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Making UUCC more unambiguous still. New criteria in general.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Here's a numerical example--IRV fails UUCC.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Finding IRV UUCC example, contd.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] many typos, but the example is possible
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Australian IRV voting
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] CVD State gerrymander data
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Candidate Vote Transfer Method for Legislative Body Elections, 29 Aug 2000
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Fwd: Re: Problems with finding the probable best governor
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] IRV UUCC badexample outline
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Brief voting clarification
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Markus--intuitive voting bottom line
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] typo re: SARC/Borda example
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] SARC answers, continued
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[Earlier messages] [Later messages]