Markus Schulze wrote: > > FPP violates Condorcet and beat path GMC. > > Example: > > 40 voters vote A > B > C. > 35 voters vote B > C > A. > 25 voters vote C > B > A. > > Due to the Condorcet criterion, candidate B must be > elected. Due to beat path GMC, candidate B must be > elected. But the FPP winner is candidate A. > > In the example above, I didn't make any presumptions > about whether the voters vote sincerely or strategically. > In the example above, I didn't make any presumptions > about the sincere opinions of the voters. Did I? Uh, yes, you presume the voters will vote sincerely in FPP, in order for A to win.
- [EM] Majority winner set LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Martin Harper
- RE: [EM] Majority winner set LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF