election-methods-list  

Messages by Date

• 2000/12/13 [EM] My definition works fine, but ideally needs work. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/13 Re: [EM] IRV majority vs Ghost Majority of a Bottom Method Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/13 [EM] Re: Condorcet Criterion for plurality. DEMOREP1
• 2000/12/13 RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
• 2000/12/13 Re: [EM] What if... Joe Weinstein
• 2000/12/13 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Norman Petry
• 2000/12/13 [EM] IRV majority vs Ghost Majority of a Bottom Method Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/12/13 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Markus Schulze
• 2000/12/13 RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. DEMOREP1
• 2000/12/12 [EM] What if... (fwd) David Catchpole
• 2000/12/12 RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/12 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/12 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/12 RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
• 2000/12/12 RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/12 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/12 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Martin Harper
• 2000/12/12 RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
• 2000/12/12 RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
• 2000/12/12 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Martin Harper
• 2000/12/12 RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/12 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/12 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Blake Cretney
• 2000/12/12 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/12 RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
• 2000/12/12 [EM] Re: Condorcet Criterion for plurality. DEMOREP1
• 2000/12/12 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Markus Schulze
• 2000/12/12 RE: Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
• 2000/12/12 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/12 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/12 RE: Condorcet Criterion for plurality. DEMOREP1
• 2000/12/12 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Markus Schulze
• 2000/12/12 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Markus Schulze
• 2000/12/11 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. David Catchpole
• 2000/12/11 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/11 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/11 Re: [EM] Guarding the Instant Runoff movement (Our Mike is mentioned) Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/11 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/11 RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/11 Re: [EM] Guarding the Instant Runoff movement (Our Mike is mentioned) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/11 RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. David Catchpole
• 2000/12/11 Re: Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. David Catchpole
• 2000/12/11 RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
• 2000/12/11 Re: Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. DEMOREP1
• 2000/12/11 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. David Catchpole
• 2000/12/11 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Martin Harper
• 2000/12/11 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Martin Harper
• 2000/12/11 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. David Catchpole
• 2000/12/11 RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
• 2000/12/11 Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Martin Harper
• 2000/12/11 Re: [EM] Guarding the Instant Runoff movement (Our Mike is mentioned) Markus Schulze
• 2000/12/10 Re: [EM] Guarding the Instant Runoff movement (Our Mike is mentioned) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/10 Re: [EM] Guarding the Instant Runoff movement (Our Mike is mentioned) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/10 RE: [EM] FWD - DELETE, DELETE, DELETE, Mike!! LAYTON Craig
• 2000/12/10 Re: [EM] FWD - DELETE, DELETE, DELETE, Mike!! MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/10 Re: [EM] Mike, help a lady out of her dis-dress. (what, what) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/10 RE: [EM] Guarding the Instant Runoff movement (Our Mike is mentio ned) LAYTON Craig
• 2000/12/10 Re: [EM] Guarding the Instant Runoff movement (Our Mike is mentioned) Markus Schulze
• 2000/12/10 Re: [EM] Guarding the Instant Runoff movement (Our Mike is mentioned) mike dillon
• 2000/12/10 Re: [EM] Guarding the Instant Runoff movement Martin Harper
• 2000/12/10 [EM] Guarding the Instant Runoff movement (Our Mike is mentioned) Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/12/10 [Fwd: [EM] request for proportional representation info] Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/10 Re: [EM] Instant Runoff Voting - collection of definitions Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/09 [EM] What's your problem Mike??? Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/12/09 [EM] FWD - DELETE, DELETE, DELETE, Mike!! Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/12/09 Re: [EM] Instant Runoff Voting - collection of definitions David Catchpole
• 2000/12/09 [EM] Mike, help a lady out of her dis-dress. (what, what) Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/12/09 Re: [EM] Instant Runoff Voting - collection of definitions MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/08 RE: [EM] Another article on the Australian controversy MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/08 [EM] FWD - [instantrunoff] What must a IRV ballot ranking look like? Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/12/08 [EM] Instant Runoff Voting - collection of definitions Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/12/08 Re: [EM] Another article on the Australian controversy David Catchpole
• 2000/12/07 RE: [EM] Another article on the Australian controversy LAYTON Craig
• 2000/12/07 Re: [EM] Another article on the Australian controversy MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/07 Re: [EM] Another article on the Australian controversy MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/07 [EM] Craig Carey - entry for your STV contest: Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/12/06 Re: [EM] Another article on the Australian controversy David Catchpole
• 2000/12/06 [EM] Another article on the Australian controversy Rob Lanphier
• 2000/12/05 Re: [EM] Poll of single-winner election methods Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/12/04 [EM] New South Wales Legislative Council counting rules (Constitution Act schedule 6 part 2) David Catchpole
• 2000/12/04 RE: Differences of sincerity definitions MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/04 Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/04 Re: [EM] Schulze's method fails Condorcet's Criterion, right? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/04 Re: [EM] Poll of single-winner election methods MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/04 Re: [EM] Schulze's method fails Condorcet's Criterion, right? Markus Schulze
• 2000/12/04 [EM] Poll of single-winner election methods Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/12/03 Re: Differences of sincerity definitions David Catchpole
• 2000/12/03 Re: [EM] New Amy Book Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/03 Re: Differences of sincerity definitions Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/03 RE: Differences of sincerity definitions David Catchpole
• 2000/12/03 RE: Differences of sincerity definitions LAYTON Craig
• 2000/12/03 RE: Differences of sincerity definitions DEMOREP1
• 2000/12/03 Re: [EM] Australia: MP says donation row highlights voting problems David Catchpole
• 2000/12/03 RE: [EM] Australia: MP says donation row highlights voting proble ms LAYTON Craig
• 2000/12/03 Re: [EM] Australia: MP says donation row highlights voting problems Markus Schulze
• 2000/12/03 RE: [EM] Differences of sincerity definitions LAYTON Craig
• 2000/12/03 Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/03 [EM] Top N per district P.R. Method DEMOREP1
• 2000/12/03 [EM] Reply to Markus' Approval criticism. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/03 Re: [EM] Schulze's method fails Condorcet's Criterion, right? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/03 [EM] Markus: Your error. My misunderstanding. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/03 Re: [EM] Representational government Blake Cretney
• 2000/12/03 Re: [EM] Schulze's method fails Condorcet's Criterion, right? Markus Schulze
• 2000/12/03 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/03 Re: [EM] SD only as a replacement for IRV Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/03 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/03 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/03 Re: [EM] Schulze's method fails Condorcet's Criterion, right? Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/03 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/02 RE: Australia: MP says donation row highlights voting problems David Catchpole
• 2000/12/02 [EM] SD only as a replacement for IRV MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/02 Re: [EM] Australia: MP says donation row highlights voting problems David Catchpole
• 2000/12/02 Re: [EM] Australia: MP says donation row highlights voting problems David Catchpole
• 2000/12/02 Re: [EM] Representational government MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/02 Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/02 Re: [EM] Schulze's method fails Condorcet's Criterion, right? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/02 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
• 2000/12/02 [EM] Representational government Andy Brown
• 2000/12/02 Re: [EM] Majority winner set JanetRAnderson
• 2000/12/02 Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/02 Re: Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/02 RE: Australia: MP says donation row highlights voting problems MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/02 [EM] Differences of sincerity definitions MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/02 Re: [EM] Schulze's method fails Condorcet's Criterion, right? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/12/02 [EM] New Amy Book DEMOREP1
• 2000/12/02 RE: Australia: MP says donation row highlights voting problems DEMOREP1
• 2000/12/02 Re: [EM] Australia: MP says donation row highlights voting problems Rob Lanphier
• 2000/12/01 Re: [EM] Australia: MP says donation row highlights voting problems Bart Ingles
• 2000/12/01 [EM] Australia: MP says donation row highlights voting problems Rob Lanphier
• 2000/12/01 Re: Majority winner set DEMOREP1
• 2000/12/01 Re: [EM] Schulze's method fails Condorcet's Criterion, right? Markus Schulze
• 2000/12/01 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
• 2000/11/30 [EM] Minor typo in Schulze/CC posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/30 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
• 2000/11/30 [EM] Schulze's method fails Condorcet's Criterion, right? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/30 RE: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/30 RE: [EM] Majority winner set LAYTON Craig
• 2000/11/30 RE: Majority winner set LAYTON Craig
• 2000/11/30 Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/30 Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/30 Re: Majority winner set Martin Harper
• 2000/11/30 Re: Majority winner set DEMOREP1
• 2000/11/30 RE: [EM] Majority winner set LAYTON Craig
• 2000/11/30 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
• 2000/11/29 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
• 2000/11/29 RE: Majority winner set DEMOREP1
• 2000/11/29 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
• 2000/11/29 RE: [EM] Majority winner set LAYTON Craig
• 2000/11/29 Re: [EM] Condorcet at the Instantrunoff Mailing List Markus Schulze
• 2000/11/29 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
• 2000/11/29 [EM] Oops! Markus explained it, I missed it. No repetition today. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/29 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
• 2000/11/28 Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/28 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
• 2000/11/28 Re: Majority winner set DEMOREP1
• 2000/11/28 Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/28 [EM] Three Anti-IRV letters, for balance: Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/11/28 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
• 2000/11/28 Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/28 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
• 2000/11/28 Re: [EM] FWDs on IRV and the Electoral College MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/28 Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/27 [EM] FWDs on IRV and the Electoral College Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/11/27 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
• 2000/11/26 RE: [EM] Smith set/IIAC/GSFC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/26 RE: [EM] Smith set/IIAC/GSFC LAYTON Craig
• 2000/11/26 Re: [EM] Instant Runoff Voting and the Exhaustive Ballot MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/26 [EM] Smith set/IIAC/GSFC Rob Lanphier
• 2000/11/26 Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/26 RE: Instant Runoff Voting and the Exhaustive Ballot DEMOREP1
• 2000/11/26 Re: Let's found an organization to oppose IRV Markus Schulze
• 2000/11/26 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
• 2000/11/26 [EM] Instant Runoff Voting and the Exhaustive Ballot Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/11/25 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
• 2000/11/25 Re: [EM] FWD - [instantrunoff] Houston column on IRV Bart Ingles
• 2000/11/25 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
• 2000/11/25 Re: [EM] FWD - [instantrunoff] Houston column on IRV Blake Cretney
• 2000/11/25 Re: [EM] FWD - [instantrunoff] Houston column on IRV MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/25 Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/25 Re: Majority winner set DEMOREP1
• 2000/11/25 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
• 2000/11/25 [EM] FWD - [instantrunoff] Houston column on IRV Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/11/24 Re: [EM] Interesting introductory article MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/24 RE: Let's found an organization to oppose IRV MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/24 Re: [EM] Will the real John Gear please stand up. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/24 Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/24 [EM] Instant Runoff MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/24 [EM] An addition to a recent post: Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/11/24 [EM] FWD - [instantrunoff] Minnesota column on IRV Instant Runoff Voting supporter
• 2000/11/23 RE: Let's found an organization to oppose IRV LAYTON Craig
• 2000/11/23 [EM] Rob Richie has spoken: Modernize Elections! - use IRV! Donald E. Davison
• 2000/11/23 [EM] FWD - Florida Fiasco Puts Radical Reforms on the Table Donald E. Davison
• 2000/11/22 [EM] CVD email newsletter 22 Nov 2000 DEMOREP1
• 2000/11/22 [EM] FWD - Instant Run-Off Letters to the Editors Donald E. Davison
• 2000/11/22 Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
• 2000/11/21 [EM] Interesting introductory article Bart Ingles
• 2000/11/21 Re: Let's found an organization to oppose IRV Bart Ingles
• 2000/11/21 Re: [EM] FWD - INSTANT RUNOFFS WILL END 'LOSER-TAKES-ALL': MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/21 Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/11/21 RE: Let's found an organization to oppose IRV LAYTON Craig

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]