Markus wrote (in part): >I suggest the following definition of sincere voting in Approval Voting: > > A voter votes "sincerely" when he approves all those candidates > he prefers to the incumbent and disapproves all those candidates > to which he prefers the incumbent. Ahh. I was halfway into writing a message against this when I realised that it's actually quite a good definition. The incumbent represents a perceived utility value of zero (no change) while the other candidates are above or below that value. I'm assuming that whether or not he votes for the incumbent does not effect the sincerity of the vote (?). Does this mean, however, that if the incumbent is no longer running, and the incumbent is more liked by a voter than any of the candidates (00 pres election?), then that voter cannot cast a sincere vote?
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
- RE: [EM] Majority winner set LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Majority winner set LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
- [EM] Representational government Andy Brown
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set JanetRAnderson
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Majority winner set Markus Schulze
