MIKE OSSIPOFF wrote: > Condorcet's Criterion: > > If there's a sincere CW, and everyone votes sincerely, then that > sincere CW should win. > > A voter votes sincerely if he doesn't vote a false preference or > leave unvoted a sincere preference that the balloting system in > use would have allowed him to vote in addition to the preferences > that he actually voted. > > Of course voting a false preference means voting X over Y when > the voter doesn't really prefer X to Y. > > By "preference", I mean pairwise preference. What if I have no opinion on Alice versus Bob, but I want to vote a false preference of A over B in order to vote a sincere preference of C over B? IE: My sincere ranked ballot would be C>(A=B). Example: "It's a fix!" balloting system. "You may vote any number of preferences of the form X>Y, as long as at least one of them is of the form Alice>X." Martin
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Markus Schulze
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Blake Cretney
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. DEMOREP1
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Markus Schulze
