> > > > Beth Cornell wrote: > > > I believe that one should vote for the candidate that has the best ideals for ones >town,state,country. Beth Cornell > > -- > > Well Corny, if you want to be ultra-meta-super-idealistic, why have >representatives? Time for some greek city-state > democracy. > Dan, have you been taking ettiquite lessons from me? :-) Maybe you weren't in the best mood that day. I always avoid critically replying to a new participant. Some of your replies that day were gratuitously hostile. But to answer your question: Why have representative democracy? Good question. We don't need it. Direct Democracy is better. But not voting for unprincipled candidates doesn't imply opposition to representative democracy, if one votes for principled candidates, and has any such candidates to vote for. Mike > > >
- Re: First Choice Criterion Beth Cornell
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- 1st Choice Criterion, part 2 Mike Ositoff
- part 4, 1st Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion Beth Cornell
- Re: First Choice Criterion Daniel Davis
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion Daniel Davis
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion Daniel Davis
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion David Catchpole
- Re: First Choice Criterion john w sarette
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion Blake Cretney
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion Blake Cretney
- Re: First Choice Criterion Blake Cretney
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion Michael A. Schoenfield
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
