> > > > Beth Cornell wrote: > > > I believe that one should vote for the candidate that has the best ideals for ones >town,state,country. Beth Cornell > > > > As opposed to those of us who think we should vote for the candidate that has >the worst ideals? Excuse me, but "not best" isn't the same as "worst". For instance, if you believe that Nader has the best ideals in '92, but you instead voted for some sleaze who seemed more winnable, more able to beat someone even worse, then you didn't vote for the candidate with best ideals, but didn't necessarily vote for the one with worst ideals. I"ve been repeatedly making the point that we should vote for our favorite, or at least never for someone we don't respect & like & trust. If you vote for a lesser-evil then you vote for an evil. Mike > > > >
- First Choice Criterion Blake Cretney
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion Beth Cornell
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- 1st Choice Criterion, part 2 Mike Ositoff
- part 4, 1st Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion Beth Cornell
- Re: First Choice Criterion Daniel Davis
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion Daniel Davis
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion Daniel Davis
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion David Catchpole
- Re: First Choice Criterion john w sarette
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion Blake Cretney
- Re: First Choice Criterion Mike Ositoff
- Re: First Choice Criterion Blake Cretney
