[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
> Due to the probable growing weakness of second, third, etc.
> choices, I again suggest that if there is a circular tie, then the
> candidate with the lowest number of first choice votes should lose
> (with the head to head pairings looked at again for the remaining
> candidates).
This would maintain the "lesser evil" dilemma which maintains the
two-choice system and prevents viable candidates from competing.
It's not worth the small alleged improvement.
---Steve (Steve Eppley [EMAIL PROTECTED])
