election-methods-list  

Messages by Date

• 1997/09/19 Re: Arrow and Gibbard-Satterthwaite Markus Schulze
• 1997/09/19 Re: Arrow and Gibbard-Satterthwaite Markus Schulze
• 1997/09/14 Re: Arrow and Gibbard-Satterthwaite schulze
• 1997/09/12 Re: Economic Voting JTGardens
• 1997/09/12 Economic Voting Travis Schilling
• 1997/07/31 P.R. using single member districts DEMOREP1
• 1997/07/30 Re: MMP defector MP - info Steve Eppley
• 1997/07/27 Re: MMP defector MP - info New Democracy
• 1997/07/21 MMP defector MP - info Tom Round
• 1997/07/05 Third Vote for Gender is Not Needed - If? New Democracy
• 1997/07/04 A Third Vote for Gender in MMP New Democracy
• 1997/06/30 The Best Part of MMP New Democracy
• 1997/06/28 MMP - Limited Improvement of PR New Democracy
• 1997/06/15 STV - Transferring of Votes New Democracy
• 1997/06/09 RE: Gerrymandering Multi Ridings DEMOREP1
• 1997/06/08 Show Time for Gerrymandering New Democracy
• 1997/06/07 Hand Counting of a STV election New Democracy
• 1997/05/29 RE: Preference Voting Challenge DEMOREP1
• 1997/05/29 Voting Systems FAQ Rob Lanphier
• 1997/05/27 Preference Voting Challenge Saari
• 1997/05/25 The Full Representation Method - Fractional Hare New Democracy
• 1997/05/12 Canadians for Proportional Representation (C4PR) New Democracy
• 1997/05/11 Re: Condorcet Truncation Example Saari
• 1997/05/10 Re: Condorcet Truncation Example Rob Lanphier
• 1997/05/06 Re: Condorcet "true preferences" Hugh Tobin
• 1997/05/06 Re: Condorcet truncation example Saari
• 1997/05/06 Condorcet "true preferences" Saari
• 1997/05/06 Re: Condorcet Truncation Example Markus Schulze
• 1997/05/04 Re: Condorcet Truncation Example Hugh Tobin
• 1997/05/04 Re: Rob Lanphier's control letter Markus Schulze
• 1997/05/03 Re: Rob Lanphier's control letter Rob Lanphier
• 1997/04/29 Re: Condorcet, Thin Ice, and Battle Cries John De Lasaux
• 1997/04/29 Condorcet, Thin Ice, and Battle Cries New Democracy
• 1997/04/27 Re: Condorcet, Thin Ice, and Battle Cries Hugh Tobin
• 1997/04/26 Re: Preference Votin vs Approval Voting Rob Lanphier
• 1997/04/26 Re: We Will Reveal No Preference Before Its Time John De Lasaux
• 1997/04/26 We Will Reveal No Preference Before Its Time New Democracy
• 1997/04/24 Question Stephen Hegarty
• 1997/04/24 Reply to Hugh Tobin on Condorcet New Democracy
• 1997/04/19 Preference Votin vs Approval Voting New Democracy
• 1997/04/17 Reply to Saari on Approval Voting New Democracy
• 1997/04/16 A Second Test of a Single Seat Election Method New Democracy
• 1997/04/16 Does the Method Confirm the Majority Winner? New Democracy
• 1997/04/14 Re: Ideal (?) Gaussian Consensus Saari
• 1997/04/13 Re: Ideal (?) Gaussian Consensus New Democracy
• 1997/04/11 Doing What has To Be Done New Democracy
• 1997/04/08 The Ideal Single Winner Method New Democracy
• 1997/04/01 Instant Consensus voting method Steve Eppley
• 1997/03/30 RE: [SAARI FAQ] - Intensity Voting New Democracy
• 1997/03/29 RE: [SAARI FAQ] - Intensity Voting DEMOREP1
• 1997/03/29 [SAARI FAQ] - Intensity Voting New Democracy
• 1997/03/18 The FAQ's of the two new Mikes New Democracy
• 1997/03/15 Limited voting in EM Saari
• 1997/03/13 FAQ voting (was Re: OPPOSE CFV: FAQ Section Headings) Steve Eppley
• 1997/03/12 Re: Current FAQ update New Democracy
• 1997/03/11 Current FAQ update Saari
• 1997/03/09 OPPOSE CFV: FAQ Section Headings Rob Lanphier
• 1997/03/09 Re: THE FAQ POLL IS NOW OPEN Rob Lanphier
• 1997/03/07 Electronic Voting Hot List DEMOREP1
• 1997/03/07 RE: Better rules for EM DEMOREP1
• 1997/03/07 Remove MCav22
• 1997/03/07 Re: THE FAQ POLL IS NOW OPEN Steve Eppley
• 1997/03/07 Relative preferences, not absolute (was Re: New sw method: "extr Steve Eppley
• 1997/03/07 Re: OPPOSE CFV: EM FAQ outline Steve Eppley
• 1997/03/07 Re: New sw method: "extreme scale" DEMOREP1
• 1997/03/06 OPPOSE CFV: EM FAQ outline Saari
• 1997/03/05 RE: CFV: FAQ Section Headings DEMOREP1
• 1997/03/05 RE: CFV: Proposed FAQ title DEMOREP1
• 1997/03/05 Re: Approval-Ranking Method (ARM) Steve Eppley
• 1997/03/05 Re: Latest official FAQ Steve Eppley
• 1997/03/05 Support and opposition? (was Re: MOAV "criterion"?) Steve Eppley
• 1997/03/05 Re: Filling a Vacancy on a council Steve Eppley
• 1997/03/05 Re: Demorep1's SW method 2/22/97 Steve Eppley
• 1997/03/05 Re: THE FAQ POLL IS NOW OPEN Steve Eppley
• 1997/03/03 Re: New sw method: "extreme scale" Saari
• 1997/03/03 ASSENT: Proposed FAQ title John De Lasaux
• 1997/03/03 ASSENT: FAQ Section Headings John De Lasaux
• 1997/03/02 CFV: Proposed FAQ title Saari
• 1997/03/02 CFV: FAQ Section Headings Saari
• 1997/03/01 Latest official FAQ Saari
• 1997/02/28 Please stay within list's scope (was Re: Demorep1's SW method 2/ Steve Eppley
• 1997/02/27 Approval-Ranking Method (ARM) DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/27 Still Vote Yes on the Orgeon Initiative New Democracy
• 1997/02/25 The Orgeon Initiative Revisited New Democracy
• 1997/02/24 Some FAQ stuff DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/23 transmission error DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/23 Demorep1's SW method 2/22/97 DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/23 RE: STV-Proxy? DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/23 RE:The Oregon Consensus Initative DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/23 Re: The Oregon Consensus Initative Rob Lanphier
• 1997/02/23 The PBS Question We Know the Answer To Rob Lanphier
• 1997/02/22 Demorep1's SW method 2/22/97 DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/22 RE: STV-Proxy? DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/22 Re: MOAV "criterion"? Saari
• 1997/02/22 Re: How to non-dictatorially generate a FAQ Saari
• 1997/02/21 Capping the Proxy Monster New Democracy
• 1997/02/21 To FAQ or not to FAQ? - What is the Problem? New Democracy
• 1997/02/20 Instant Runoff = two party system? (was RE: Ballot Access laws f Steve Eppley
• 1997/02/20 RE: MOAV "criterion"? Steve Eppley
• 1997/02/20 Re: FAQ Candidate (Re: [ER] Methods versus Selling) Steve Eppley
• 1997/02/20 STV-Proxy? (was RE: Two fairer(?) variations of STV) Steve Eppley
• 1997/02/20 Re: single-winner ballot with restricted rankings? Steve Eppley
• 1997/02/20 Re: How to non-dictatorially generate a FAQ Rob Lanphier
• 1997/02/20 Re: MOAV "criterion"? DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/20 Re: How to non-dictatorially generate a FAQ MCav22
• 1997/02/20 How to non-dictatorially generate a FAQ Saari
• 1997/02/18 Re: FAQ Candidate (Re: [ER] Methods versus Selling) DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/18 RE: Two fairer(?) variations of STV DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/17 Re: Let's rename Smith-Condorcet MCav22
• 1997/02/17 majority? (Was Re: [ER] A Summary of the Problems with the Other Methods Saari
• 1997/02/17 Re: MOAV "criterion"? Saari
• 1997/02/14 Demorep1's SW method 2/14/97 DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/14 RE: MOAV "criterion"? DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/12 RE: Ballot Access laws for ranked ballots Marcus Ganley
• 1997/02/12 RE: Request: please post sample format of ranked ballot Marcus Ganley
• 1997/02/09 RE: MOAV "criterion"? DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/08 Request: please post sample format of ranked ballot Steve Eppley
• 1997/02/08 Re: Condorcet Language for Municipal Charter Steve Eppley
• 1997/02/06 Condorcet Potential Results DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/05 Flakey list behavior Rob Lanphier
• 1997/02/03 Condorcet Language for Municipal Charter Hugh Tobin
• 1997/02/03 Re: The New Welcome Message Rob Lanphier
• 1997/02/03 Re: The Davison Standard Steve Eppley
• 1997/02/03 Re: The New Welcome Message Steve Eppley
• 1997/02/03 Re: How to unsubscribe from election-methods-list Steve Eppley
• 1997/02/03 RE: MOAV "criterion"? Steve Eppley
• 1997/02/03 IIAC (was (Fwd) re: Mike's criticism of Bruce) Steve Eppley
• 1997/02/02 RE: The Approval Voting Home Page DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/02 Condorcet books DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/02 Third party Condorcet data DEMOREP1
• 1997/02/02 Another Desperate 5-Minute Reply Mike Ossipoff
• 1997/02/02 The Approval Voting Home Page Rob Lanphier
• 1997/02/01 Getting Off Dave Watts
• 1997/01/29 Re: censorship vs. responsibility (was Re: Truncation Resistance #2 Mike Ossipoff
• 1997/01/29 The Davison Standard New Democracy
• 1997/01/29 RE: MOAV "criterion"? DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/28 re: Mike's criticism of Bruce Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/28 MOAV "criterion"? (was RE: Truncation Resistance #2 criterion) Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/26 Re: Truncation Resistance #2 criterion (was Re: First Choic Hugh Tobin
• 1997/01/24 RE: Truncation Resistance #2 criterion DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/24 Multiple Winners Reform DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/24 RE: PR + Condorcet Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/24 RE: Truncation Resistance #2 criterion DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/23 RE: PR + Condorcet DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/22 Re: Donaldshock (was Re: First Choices tiebreaker) Mike Ossipoff
• 1997/01/22 Re: Donaldshock (was Re: First Choices tiebreaker) Rob Lanphier
• 1997/01/22 Donaldshock (was Re: First Choices tiebreaker) Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/22 Young's translation of Condorcet (was RE: Left or right loser) Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/22 I will be temporarily busy. Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/22 Re: 50-49 Tie Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/22 Truncation Resistance #2 criterion (was Re: First Choices tiebre Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/21 retirement p.s. Mike Ossipoff
• 1997/01/20 50-49 Tie -- Math Correction DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/19 Re: 50-49 Tie Mike Ossipoff
• 1997/01/19 What's a majority in Approval? Mike Ossipoff
• 1997/01/19 Re: Stopping Plurality by DEMOREP1 New Democracy
• 1997/01/18 50-49 Tie DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/18 Re: Let's rename Smith-Condorcet Hugh Tobin
• 1997/01/17 RE: The Greater Majority Method DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/17 Two comments by Ordeshoo Ed Still
• 1997/01/16 Hitler and Plurality DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/16 Plurality Data DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/16 Re: The Greater Majority Method Mike Ossipoff
• 1997/01/15 First Choices tiebreaker DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/14 Two comments by Ordeshook Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/14 Re: Newbie on this list Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/14 Re: Let's rename Smith-Condorcet Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/13 Re: Let's rename Smith-Condorcet Rob Lanphier
• 1997/01/12 RE: Let's rename Smith-Condorcet DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/12 Newbie on this list John De Lasaux
• 1997/01/10 RE: Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem Mike Ossipoff
• 1997/01/10 RE: Fishburn Rich Parties Example Mike Ossipoff
• 1997/01/07 question for Bruce re: M1//M2 (was Re: Brief Descriptions of Vot Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/06 RE: Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/06 RE: Fishburn Rich Parties Example DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/05 RE: Approval Voting and Broda Count are Tom Round
• 1997/01/05 Re: FAQ Rob Lanphier
• 1997/01/05 Re: Fishburn Rich Parties Example Rob Lanphier
• 1997/01/05 p.s. regarding motives Mike Ossipoff
• 1997/01/04 Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/04 Oops (was Re: Lorrie Cranor's paper (Re: Coombs' Method)) Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/04 Re: Donald Davison on Condorcet (was Re: Reply to Hugh Tobi Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/04 Fishburn//Copeland//Condorcet Rob Lanphier
• 1997/01/03 FAQ Mike Ossipoff
• 1997/01/03 Fewest votes in worst defeat tie breaker-errata DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/03 (Fwd) 2 more Lorrie Cranor web addresses Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/02 Re: Lorrie Cranor's paper (Re: Coombs' Method) Rob Lanphier
• 1997/01/02 Re: Fewest votes in worst defeat tie breaker Mike Ossipoff
• 1997/01/02 RE: Absolute Vodka Corrupts Absolutely Mike Ossipoff
• 1997/01/02 meaning of majority rule (was Re: N factorial combinations (was Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/02 Re: Coombs meets LO2E-2 Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/02 Splitting votes in Coombs? (was Re: Coombs' Method) Steve Eppley
• 1997/01/02 R.I. Case DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/02 RE: Absolute Vodka Corrupts Absolutely DEMOREP1
• 1997/01/01 RE: Texas U.S. Rep. Runoff r Tom Round
• 1996/12/30 Condorcet-Ossipoff (was Coombs: Full count, etc) DEMOREP1
• 1996/12/30 RE: Lorrie Cranor's paper (Re: Coombs' Method) DEMOREP1
• 1996/12/29 Re: Lorrie Cranor's Example Rob Lanphier
• 1996/12/29 Lorrie Cranor's Example New Democracy
• 1996/12/29 Don's modified Coombs Mike Ossipoff

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]