I should add that, in a Re-Voting-By-Favorite-Count-Rule election, a person could, of course choose Criterion-Mitigated-IRO, or Criterion-Mitigated-Plurality as their favorite methodd in the 1st count. And there could be a 4th option, though now the list of options is starting to get to long & complicated: A voter could indicate that hir ranking will remain as-is, except that any pair-beaten alternative shall be dropped from it unless every alternative is pair-beaten, and that any majority-rejected alternative shall be dropped from it unless every alternaitve is majority-rejected. Maybe one way, perhaps the simplest way, to present that option would be to present it as one of the possible methods to indicate as one's favorite, a method whose only rule is that those pair-beaten or majority-rejected alternatives are its losers. And this "method" would be combined with the 2nd option, that of dropping everything but the winner (in this case, the winners) from your ranking. No, maybe it would be simpler to offer that as a separate 4th option, if at all. Mike --
