Yesterday, in my reply to Joe about what to do about LWV's
shameless IRV promotion to its members, I made a typo, because it was late. 
I meant to say that inexplicably the study's workbook doesn't
ask us how single-winner methods do by the criteria, but I
accidentally substituted the word "inexplicitly" for "inexplicably".

Of course it isn't really so inexplicable, because it's explained
by the IRVies knowledge that IRV doesn't do well by objective criteria.


Mike Ossipoff

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

Reply via email to