Martin Harper wrote: > In plurality you want to bolster your support your favourite because > apparently popular candidates get compromise votes and don't get chucked > out in favour of compromises. In approval, though, the same doesn't > apply. I can see only one case where one would want to insincerely dump > your favourite in a poll: I never said people would dump their favorites in the poll and I can't see any rational person doing so (unless they had the kind of omniscience it would take to predict the effect on other voters). What I was referring to is voters who would be likely to vote two (or more) candidates in the election, stating in a poll that they will only vote for one (their favorite). Thus if I say I will vote A and not AB, I might hope to cause some B voters to vote AB as well. -- Richard
- [EM] draws in IRV Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] draws in IRV David Catchpole
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting... Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Vo... Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runof... Richard Moore
- RE: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: Bart Ingles
- RE: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Approval Voting vs Instant Runoff Voting: MIKE OSSIPOFF
